 |
|
|
|||||
There’s a lot to say about the White House’s new COVID-19 webpage. Before we get into it, here’s what happened. The Trump administration has replaced COVID.gov (which is now unavailable), the federal government’s main source of information about the coronavirus, redirecting it to a revamped new page on whitehouse.gov called “Lab Leak: The True Origins of COVID,” which is riddled with misleading and conspiratorial claims about the coronavirus, asserting that the virus leaking from a lab in Wuhan, China, is the “most likely” origin. It’s a theory that emerged in the early days of the pandemic and has been repeatedly disputed by health experts. (A team of WHO-appointed scientists flew to Wuhan in early 2021 to investigate the source of the pandemic concluded the lab-leak theory was “extremely unlikely.”) The original website, launched under Biden, promoted information about the coronavirus vaccine, treatment, and testing. The new one rewrites the historic timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic, the role Democrats played in it, along withyou guessed itthe role of the media, which it also blames for discrediting its lab leak theory. The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 publication which was used repeatedly by public health officials and the media to discredit the lab leak theory was prompted by Dr. Fauci to push the preferred narrative that COVID-19 originated naturally,” the site reads. “This administration prioritizes transparency over all else,” a senior administration official told Fox News Digital. “The American people deserve to know the truth about the Covid pandemic and we will always find ways to reach communities with that message.” Old grudges resurface The site blames the Biden administration, and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in particular (which now faces a massive overhaul, including staff layoffs, as DOGE slashes its budgets and staff), for engaging “in a multi-year campaign of delay, confusion, and non-responsiveness in an attempt to obstruct the Select Subcommittees investigation and hide evidence that could incriminate or embarrass senior public health officials.” It also takes a swipe at former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci, claiming that he misled the public with his recommendation that Americans keep “6 feet apart” and use masksboth of which were credited with helping to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Instead, it argues “there was no conclusive evidence that masks effectively protected Americans from COVID-19.” The site also insinuates that former President Joe Biden pardoned Fauci for how he handled the pandemic. (Biden has said that he issued preemptive pardons for Fauci and a host of others, as a guard against potential “revenge” from Trump in his second term.) Finally, a lot has been said about the White House website’s dramatic bold redesign, and this page is no exception. On social media, users are making fun of the layout and font of the page, which looks both imposing and flashy, and unusual for a sitting president.
Category:
E-Commerce
When it comes to electric vehicles in the U.S., California is by far the largest market: It accounts for nearly a third of the country’s EV sales. And for years, Tesla dominated this market, making up a majority of those sales. But thats changed: Teslas share of EV sales in California fell below 50% in the first quarter of 2025even as sales of other EVs increased. In the first quarter of 2024, registrations for new Tesla vehicles made up 55.5% of Californias EV market. But in the first quarter of 2025, it fell to 43.9%, according to data from the California New Car Dealers Association (CNCDA). At the same time, registrations for all other EV models increased by 35%. Overall, zero emissions vehicle sales rose 7.3% in California between January and March. Still, no other companies are close to competing with Tesla when it comes to EV models. But they have seen their share increase slightly. The second highest market share went to Ford, with 6%up 1.5% from the first quarter in 2024followed by BMW, with 5.6% (up .7% year over year) and then Hyundai, with 5.4% (up 1.1% year over year). When it comes to the top selling battery electric and plug-in hybrid models in 2025, Tesla still took the number one and two spots with its Model Y and Model 3. There have been more than 23,000 Model Ys sold in California so far this year, and nearly 14,000 Model 3s. Hyundai took the third and fourth spots with its Prologue and Ioniq 5, but those sales were much lowerabout 4,400 and 3,700, respectively. Fords Mustang Mach-E took the number five spot, with 3,600 new sales. Tesla backlash is affecting sales everywhere Telsa once held an even bigger share of Californias EV market. In 2023, it accounted for 60% of EV sales, and in 2022, 71%. Part of that decline is likely due to the increase in EV offerings from other brands. But Teslas shrinking sales in California, especially this year, are also a sign of the companys overall slide away from EV dominancea trend fueled in part by CEO Elon Musks involvement in the Trump administration. An aging product lineup and backlash against Elon Musks political initiatives are likely key factors for the decline in Tesla BEV market share, the CNCDA wrote in its report. Along with the political backlash, Tesla dealt with manufacturing disruptions this year that led to downtime at its assembly plants globally. Across Europe, Tesla has already sold 42.6% fewer cars this year, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers Associationeven though, once again, overall EV sales are up. Sales of Teslas China-made EVs also plunged 49.2% in February alone, compared to the year prior. (Teslas sold in the U.S. are made in California and Texas, though they still include some parts from abroad; Tesla does have a factory in Germany to sell in Europe, though it also exports cars from China.) Teslas stock price has also crashed, falling more than 40% since the start of the year. In one day alone at the beginning of April, the company lost 15% of its value. For years, Tesla was the dominant brand associated with electric vehicles, but thats clearly changing. Other car companies are still building up their EV offerings, and even bringing them statesideHyundai recently opened a $7 billion manufacturing plant in Georgia to build electric and hybrid vehicles here. When it comes to overall car sales, though, the Trump administration’s tariffs on auto imports have muddled the years outlook. In March and April, customers flocked to buy cars before the tariffs kicked in, but its not yet clear if those tariffs will lead to higher vehicle prices, and by how much. California itself expects new vehicle registrations to fall 2.3% this year compared to last, because of U.S. trade policies.
Category:
E-Commerce
If you thought youd heard the last of the viral Apple dance, think again. The TikToker behind it is now suing Roblox over its unauthorized use. Last year, during the height of Brat summer, Roblox partnered with singer Charli XCX to feature her music and likeness in an in-game concert within “Dress to Impress,” a fashion game on the platform. In a lawsuit filed last week in Los Angeles, Kelley Heyerthe creator of the dance set to Charli XCXs hit songalleges that Roblox used her choreography in the update before finalizing negotiations to officially license the dance, as first reported by Polygon. Heyer first posted the Apple dance on June 15, 2024, and submitted a copyright application on August 30. That was after Roblox reached out to her about licensing the dance as an emote for players to purchase. Roblox added the dance emote, an in-game action used to express a characters personality, in mid-August to coincide with the update. According to the lawsuit, Heyer expressed her willingness to license the dance on August 12, but alleges that Roblox has refused to finalize a license agreement and that she has received no compensation for the use of her choreography. Roblox removed the emote from the game in November 2024but not before it was sold over 60,000 times, earning an estimated $123,000 from the copyrighted work, per the lawsuit. Heyer hasnt seen any of that revenue, and since the dance is entirely separate from the Charli XCX song, shes suing to claim her share (Charli XCX is not named in the lawsuit). Roblox moved forward using Kelleys IP without a signed agreement, attorney Miki Anzai said in a statement to Polygon. Kelley is an independent creator who should be compensated fairly for her work and we saw no other option than to file suit to prove that. We remain willing and open to settle and hope to come to a peaceful agreement. Roblox has since responded. A spokesperson told Polygon: “As a platform powered by a community of creators, Roblox takes the protection of intellectual property very seriously and is committed to protecting intellectual property rights of independent developers and creators to brands and artists both on and off the platform.” They continued: Roblox is confident in its position and the propriety of its dealings in this matter and looks forward to responding in court.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||