 |
|
|
|||||
When an AI-assisted résumé lands on a hiring manager’s desk, most people have the knee-jerk reaction to chuck it straight onto the reject pile. While more and more companies are using AI in their day-to-day operations, when it comes to résumés and cover letters, the use of artificial intelligence remains taboo. The importance of AI-savvy talent This instinctive aversion to AI is costing firms invaluable AI-savvy talent. And with the demand and competition for AI skills so fierce, many employers are letting prospective talent slip through their fingers, straight into the laps of their competitors. Its time to overhaul recruitment processes out of the dark ages. We need to reshape and sharpen the AI-powered workplace that’s already taking shape. To do this, companies need to root out anti-AI bias, implement AI-based tasks in their skills assessments, and then actually prioritize hiring for AI talent. The hypocrisy of rejecting AI-generated résumés A recent study by Capterra found that more than half of job seekers have used AI to aid their job search as they look to dull the sting of a brutal and unforgiving job market. Now, it’s not just the applicants who are using AI. Seven in ten businesses admit they’re happy to use AI to reject applicants without any review or oversight from a human. Yet despite their willingness to let AI make the hard decisions for them, a staggering majority of hiring managers say they view AI-generated content on a job application in a negative light. Some have even admitted that they’d be less likely to hire a candidate who’s used AI altogether. So you could be rejected by AI for using AI. The irony is palpable. Hypocrisy aside, hiring managers’ AI aversion is ruinous. Companies can’t get enough of AI at the moment. They’re so desperate for AI talent that they’re happy to sacrifice experience if it means the candidate knows how to use a chatbot. Why, then, are firms turning away candidates who use AI to aid their job search? Getting rid of anti-AI bias in hiring The first step firms must take to achieve this is to root out anti-AI bias in their hiring processes. To achieve this, executives need to make it their responsibility to ensure hiring managers are familiar with the business’s skills needs now and over the coming years. In addition, they should make sure that indications of these skills aren’t being ignored or punished at the application stage. Instilling hiring managers with a stronger understanding of how businesses are deploying AI will help reduce bias and ensure that hiring managers can spot AI talent amid a sea of applicants. Introducing AI-based tasks in skills assessments Then, we need to see companies introduce AI-based tasks in their skills assessments. This should be for all job roles, not just tech-oriented ones. Along with the usual tasks hiring managers typically give, like drafting a client brief or giving a presentation, employers should assess candidates on their ability to use and deploy AI tools effectively. AI-based tasks might include creating a prompt for a chatbot capable of outputting high-quality materialswhere they mark applicants for the quality of the output. Or if the business employs specific AI tools, they can test applicants on their knowledge of the tool or ability to get to grips with it in a short time frame. Finally, employers should take the final step and strategically prioritize AI-fluent applicants over those who show no capability (or an unwillingness to learn). They might want to do this by creating an AI-capability score. Hiring managers need to prioritize AI skills, talents, and appetite, just as they have the mandate to hire for other role-relevant technical skills. AI will impact every single role within every company in the next few years. And in a world where AI tools are increasingly critical to businesses’ success, a base level of AI capability among workforces will be a make-or-break factor. Firms that continue to penalize AI use and ignore its critical nature to their business risk relegating themselves to anti-AI obscurity. Theyre likely to find themselves left in the dust of their more open-minded and forward-thinking competitors. If youre a hiring manager, why not take another look at those AI-supported applications? After all, the future of your workforce might sit behind them.
Category:
E-Commerce
Where legislatures have refused to boost pay and benefits for workers, advocates have often taken the fight straight to voters. In recent years, voters in Michigan, Missouri, and Nebraska overwhelmingly backed higher state minimum wages and guaranteed paid sick leave at the polls. But despite that strong showing of support, lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are now trying to water down or even roll back the measures their constituents approved. In November, 58% of Missouri voters approved Proposition A, which raises the state minimum wage to $15 by 2026 and requires employers to provide paid sick leave. That level of support, said Missouri Jobs with Justice Policy Director Richard Von Glahn, stems from the fact that the measure speaks to the experiences that voters have in their lives and where the economy is not working for them. Typically, when his organization was out gathering signatures, voters expressed surprise that the minimum wage was not already $15 an hour and that paid sick leave was not already a guarantee. The vote shows it was the clear will of what voters want, Von Glahn said. But in March, the Missouri House passed legislation repealing the paid sick leave measure and undoing the states decades-long practice of regularly updating the minimum wage to keep up with inflation. If the bill becomes law, wage increases will cease in January 2027. To justify such changes, Republican state Representative Mitch Boggs said, Of course the people voted for it. It would be like asking your teenager if he wanted a checkbook. Theyre going to vote for it every time. Republican state Representative Scott Miller put it another way: Just because 57% of the people that voted that day voted in favor of something, that doesnt make it right. Theyre taking away the choice of businesses to engage in [the] free market. Its not just lawmakers trying to undo the will of the voters, however. A group of businesses and individuals have asked the state Supreme Court to strike down the measure entirely, arguing that it violates the state Constitutions single subject requirement. In their lawsuit they claim that wages and paid sick time are separate issues that should not have been combined in a single measure. Von Glahn pushed back on that argument: Wages for hours worked and wages for paid sick time, thats part of total compensation. As a working person, if I have money in my check, do I care if its from paid sick days or from hours that I worked? Nebraska voters passed their own paid sick leave ballot measure by a staggering 74% this past November. A majority of voters in every legislative district supported it, and the support was higher than for the lawmakers themselves. Thats not the only measure state lawmakers want to change, however. In 2022, nearly 59% of voters approved a measure that will raise the states minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2026 and keep increasing it in later years to keep up with inflation. Nebraskans really care about their neighbors, Jo Giles, executive director of the Womens Fund of Omaha, said of the support both measures received. Paid sick leave, she said, is a common sense solution. As in Missouri, many voters she spoke to while gathering signatures were surprised it wasnt already guaranteed. And yet efforts to get lawmakers to take action themselves had not succeeded. We tried for many years, Giles said, including during the height of the pandemic when workers were getting sick by the thousands. But bills never moved forward. After many, many attempts, we determined, Okay, were not going to get it through the Legislature, so lets ask the people what they want, Giles said. It was pretty clear what the people wanted: They wanted paid sick leave, they wanted to increase the minimum wage. That hasnt stopped Nebraska lawmakers from seeking to change the measures approved by their constituents. Last year, two state lawmakers introduced bills to exempt young workers from the higher wage. The Nebraska Legislature is officially nonpartisan, but one of the lawmakers was aligned with Democrats and the other with Republicans. The effort failed to advance in the Legislature. This session, those two lawmakers and others are seeking to weaken both the minimum wage and sick leave policies. Legislative Bill 698, introduced by a Republican-aligned senator, would exempt companies with 10 or fewer employees from the paid sick leave requirement. Yet the measure voters passed already makes an allowance for small businesses by allowing those with 20 or fewer employees to provide their workers with fewer days of leave. The bill would also exempt agricultural workers and those under 16 while eliminating employees right to sue their employers if they arent given the leave theyre owed. Giles argued that these changes gut the core aspects of the initiative. Another bill introduced this year, Legislative Bill 258, meanwhile, would allow employers to pay people younger than 19 a lower minimum wage and would eliminate future minimum wage increases. Beyond the impact on workers themselves, Giles believes lawmakers actions could harm the entire state. What does that mean for our overall democracy if people cannot exercise their voice and implement policies that are popular? she said. Residents votes should be honored. In both Missouri and Nebraska, conservative lawmakers have led the charge to roll back ballot measures. In Michigan, Democrats have joined the effort. Back in 2012, Mothering Justice, a nonprofit that advocates for issues impacting women of color, started pushing for a paid sick leave bill in the state Legislature, but Republicans stood in the way. It became clear that if we wanted to get this done, we would have to go straight to voters, said Danielle Atkinson, the nonprofits founder. Her group was poised to do so, submitting more than 280,000 signatures to put both paid sick leave and a higher minimum wage on the ballot in 2018. There was always overwhelming support from voters, she said, because it was extremely popular and needed. But then the Republican-controlled Legislature stepped in that September. Over united Democratic opposition in the state Senate but with some Democratic support in the state House, lawmakers passed legislation to raise the minimum wage and institute a paid sick leave requirement before voters had the chance to weigh in. That wasnt because lawmakers agreed with the ballot measures; they did so explicitly to come back and gut both measures later on, something that would have been much harder had the issues passed by ballot measure. State Senate Republican Majority Leader Arlan B. Meekhof explained the vote this way: The Senate adopted the policy to preserve the ability for this Legislature and future legislatures to amend the statute to better fit our state and our economy. And lawmakers did in fact later amend the legislation by voting to delay the minimum wage increase by nearly a decade, scrap future inflation adjustments and preserve a lower tipped minimum wage. Lawmakers also exempted employers with fewer than 50 employees from paid sick leave and scaled it back for everyone else. The groups behind the ballot measures fought back in the courts, arguing that what lawmakers did violated the state Constitution. That took time, energy, and a considerable amount of resources, Atkinson said. But we thought it was important to fight for the will of the people and direct democracy. Last summer, it seemed they had finally won: The state supreme court found the Legislature had indeed violated the state Constitution and reinstated the original wage and sick leave measures. The new benefits were set to go into effect on February 21. We were extremely hopeful, Atkinson said. We were like, Great, on to the next fight. But the Legislature wasnt done intervening. An hour before midnight on February 20, lawmakers passed bills to preserve a lower tipped minimum wage, delay implementation of paid sick leave, exempt young and temporary seasonal workers, reduce guaranteed unpaid time off for employees of small businesses, and strip workers of the right to sue employers for violating the new rights. This time, nearly half of Democrats in both chambers joined with all Republicans to pass the measures, and Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed them into law. The governor had heard concerns about implementation of the new law, according to a statement from spokesperson Stacey LaRouche, while the bill was under consideration, and supported a bipartisan deal that protects servers and wait staff, while also providing certainty to small businesses and helping Michigan remain competitive. Business groups, particularly the Michigan Restaurant and Lodging Association, had lobbied hard for the tipped minimum wage changes. It was very clear that lawmakers of both parties were being influenced by the business community, Atkinson said. The restaurant industry did a very good job of manufacturing outrage. Atkinson is frustrated that those tactics succeeded. Michigan is a place where were known for workers rights, and we had an opportunity to be a pretty big part of a larger movement to eliminate a sub-minimum wage, and we missed it, she noted, referring to the lower wage employers can pay tipped employees. Having Democrats join in was even worse. When you see Democrats introducing legislation thats undermining workers rights, it makes . . . an easier target for Republicans to do the same, she said. Its really unfortunate that that came from members of a party that claims to be for workers rights. This piece was originally published by Capital & Main, which reports from California on economic, political, and social issues.
Category:
E-Commerce
For years, baby boomers have been aging in place and keeping home turnover low. And now, not only are boomers holding onto their homes, theyre also the generation buying the most propertyboxing out millennial homebuyers for only the second year since 2013. Millennials, who range from 26 to 44 years old, have largely dominated the housing market for the past decade. The only exceptions to this rule have occurred in 2023 and 2024, according to data from the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Between July 2023 and July 2024, the share of millennial homebuyers dropped to 29%, down from 38% a year ago. Meanwhile, boomers (ages 60 to 78) accounted for 42% of home purchases. In a plot twist, baby boomers have overtaken millennialsthe largest U.S. populationto become the top generation of home buyers, Jessica Lautz, NAR deputy chief economist and vice president of research, said in a press release. Whats striking is that half of older boomers and two out of five younger boomers are purchasing homes entirely with cash, bypassing financing altogether. What does this mean for aspiring homebuyers? While this is only the second time that boomers have overtaken millennials in recent years, it does represent a larger pattern: First-time homebuyers are getting older. In 1991, the median age of first-time homebuyers in the U.S. was 28 years old. In 2024, it was 38 years old. As real estate expert Lance Lambert put it, the median first-time U.S. homebuyer in 2024 (age 38) has been out of high school for 20 years but is also only 24 years away from the earliest age at which they could receive Social Security benefits (age 62). One main driver for this shift is the fact that both cost of living and home affordability have increased significantly in the past several years. Since 2020, the income needed to afford the average American home has shot up by a whopping 79%. Starter homes are a thing of the past for many aspiring young homebuyers. Still, some young Americans are managing to become first-time homebuyers, and theyre establishing new standards for home ownership along the way. Per the NAR report, 3% of homebuyers over the past year were Gen Zers. Gen Z is slowly entering the housing market with the lowest household income and theyre more likely to be single than other buyers, Lautz said. Of the generations, Gen Z had the largest share of single, female homebuyerspresumably as many women put off marriage or choose to remain single.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||