 |
|
|
|||||
In 2019, when the first Trump administration rolled back energy efficiency standards on light bulbs, President Trump said that modern bulbs dont make you look as good,” and as a vain person, thats very important to me. The color of the light was different in the early 2000s, when blue-ish LED bulbs were hitting the market. But current LEDs can largely replicate the warmth of light from old incandescent bulbs. The price to incandescents is now also equivalent. LEDs can last for 15 years, rather than the one year that an older bulb might have lasted. They also use 75% to 90% less energy, shrinking the carbon footprint of buildings. A homeowner who switches to LEDs throughout their home can save thousands of dollars over the lifetime of the bulbs. The tech is objectively better for consumers. Now, after Biden had restored lighting standards, Trump wants to roll them back again. But for manufacturers, regardless of policy, the transition has already happened: factories are unlikely to ever go back to making outdated incandescent bulbs, which use a completely different process of production. Signify, the global lighting giant that spun off from Philips, told Fast Company that because the transition to LEDs has been underway for more than a decade, it doesnt expect the trend to reverse. The industry shift began nearly 20 years ago The shift began in 2007, when President George W. Bush signed the Energy Independence and Security Act into law. It included new standards that inefficient incandescent light bulbs couldn’t meet. “By default, it forced a transition in the industry to different technologies,” says Kathy Sterio, president of GE Lighting, which was acquired by Savant, a smart home company, in 2020. The shift to LEDs happened in stages since the technology was expensive at first. Before LEDs became dominant, there was a push for CFLs, but consumers didn’t like the twisted shape or the color of the light; halogen lights, another alternative, weren’t nearly as efficient. [Photo: GE Lighting/Savant] LEDs had already been on the market. But the law helped accelerate adoption, Sterio says. As production volume increased, prices dropped, helping adoption happen even faster. In 2019, when Trump loosened efficiency requirements, the transition slowed. But the industry’s move to LEDs was already well underway. When Biden tightened the standards again, the full phaseout of incandescent bulbs happened last year. Manufacturing had already dwindled by that point. Supply chains can’t easily go back To make LEDs, the lighting industry had to revamp its supply chains. It was heavily invested in incandescent and fluorescent tech; factories needed different equipment to make the new builds. Making LEDs begins at semiconductor factories, where semiconductor material is grown inside high-pressure chambers. Then it’s turned into thin chips and packaged for use in lights that are assembled elsewhere. It’s nothing like the process of making a simple incandescent bulb, which works by heating up metal wires to produce light. When lighting companies switched, their suppliers couldn’t just make a few tweaks to their production lines. Now, although there are still some Chinese factories making incandescent bulbs for niche applications (and U.S. law allows for some uses outside regular bulbs in homes), the industry has almost entirely moved on. It’s unlikely the remaining factories could handle much additional volume, Sterio says. And because the Bush-era law passed nearly two decades ago, most of the equipment “has long been disassembled,” she says. “It would be very, very difficult to go back to the incandescent world, just in terms of equipment and know-how.” LEDs are now the dominant type of lighting globally. Most consumers likely don’t even consider the tech inside the bulbs, says Sterio. “The packaging looks the same, the bulbs look the samethe same shape, the same fit, the same color output,” she says. The most noticeable difference: the computer chip inside means that bulbs can be smartprogrammed to change color throughout the day, for example, or to turn on before you get home at night. “I think the LED technology has allowed us to bring a lot more value to your socket than we’ve been able to in the past,” she says.
Category:
E-Commerce
Year-end performance reviews can be time-consuming. Yet the end and start of the year is when employees and managers are inundated with a heavy workload. Emotions range from elated to angst-ridden. After all, performance evaluations directly impact professional reputations, salary increases, bonuses, and promotions. The importance of revisiting objectives This reality begs the question of just how effective performance evaluations are and what employees can do to balance the scales. A recent SHRM study indicates that roughly 50% of companies employ traditional annual performance evaluation processes based on whether they achieve the goals that they set at the start of the year. A separate MIT study found that both employees and managers rarely review these same goals and objectives throughout the year. These objectives often lie dormant until they suddenly become the basis for high-stakes performance assessments, contributing to employee anxiety around year-end reviews. There are many negative implications of not revisiting objectives. Employees are less likely to know what their employers expect, which increases the likelihood of missing opportunities to course correct performance throughout the year. Those who don’t actively seek clarity regularly run the risk of missing opportunities for insights and coaching from either managers or mentors that might help them improve and meet unarticulated performance expectations. Reviewing objectives frequently also helps keep managers apprised of obstacles that surface over time. A recent SHRM study highlights that employees agree these are missed opportunities. Yet only 28% of companies have moved formal performance processes that adopt more frequent reviews of performance goals. This became a reality for Jennifer, a CTO at a health tech company. After an optimistic team goal setting offsite in February, unexpected regulatory challenges arose in August, derailing their initial plans. Forced to pivot and manage recurring crises, and with minimal interactions to update her traveling manager, Jennifer is headed into her performance discussion worried that her reviewer wont take these obstacles and infrequent updates into consideration. Failing to meet expectations, especially due to uncontrollable circumstances, can feel threatening. However, it’s also an opportunity for reflection, perspective, learning and practicing better conversational hygiene around future performance. Here are three strategies to foolproof your performance review. Shift mindset to progress (rather than goal achievement) Busy leaders often struggle with binary views of progress, dismissing accomplishments that don’t fully meet original standards. The progress principle suggests that reflecting on smaller wins over shorter time frames can significantly enhance one’s sense of achievement and encourage forward movement when we feel stuck. By asking good questions, we learn a great deal about smaller accomplishments made throughout the year. For example: What outcomes were gained from Q1? How did those outcomes and learnings compound over time to bring new results later on? These questions dig deep to surface smaller wins people take for granted. Exploring the learning that came from smaller, progressive wins nearly always reveals something more significant. This exercise can serve to restore a sense of self-efficacy and motivation. If employees share their learnings intermittently with the managers, it can dissipate anticipatory anxiety before performance discussions. Initiating intermittent, informal check-ins with our manager doesnt just provide a mechanism to insights into how performance is progressing. You can use this as an opportunity to discuss and review sudden priority shifts in work and help create mutual understanding of unanticipated roadblocks. Focus on reasons rather than excuses Initiating your own discussions about performance well before a scheduled review can be beneficial even if it feels uncomfortable. When individuals openly acknowledge their missteps without prompt, others are more likely to perceive them as responsible and trustworthy. External obstacles to goals always provide learning opportunities. Its important to provide context when youre discussing missed targets, but avoid explanations that sound like excuses. Instead, frame challenges with self-awareness, ownership and action plans for future improvements. Taking ownership demonstrates responsibility, builds trust and can also offer you a sense of relief before performance discussions. Use the opportunity to build a better relationship with your manager A recent study indicates that managers have an outsized impact on their employees well-being. Employees reported that the quality of their relationship with their manager accounts for up to 69% of their mental health, which is the same as a spouse or a partner. This is why I encourage clients to have more personal, genuine conversations with employees and managers. These discussions provide the opportunity for both parties to discuss mutual needs and discuss any misunderstandings without judgment. Recently, I offered to conduct year-end stakeholder feedback for a CEO client worried about the consequences of missing full performance on his goals. Id gathered feedback just months before, but instincts told me to do so again. Board member feedback revealed the oppositethey were impressed with the CEO’s growth and progress, despite not fully meeting initial goals. They appreciated his improvements in previous problem areas and understood the market challenges. These insights prevented unnecessary anxiety about the upcoming review. Empathy also matters as managers as companies often evaluate them based on their team’s performance. This can be unfair when challenges arise beyond their direct control. Understanding this dynamic is important for both parties. Talking through it gets it out on the table. Knowing that performance outcomes impact so much, makes having sincere, honest conversations worth the effort. When employees and managers openly discuss progress and small wins frequently, it creates more opportunities for mutual support and adjust objectives for relevancy. Better yet, it’s the perfect opportunity to strengthen relationships while bringing the peace of mind for a fresh start to the year.
Category:
E-Commerce
In many ways, architecture is the star of the 2024 film The Brutalist. Nominated for 10 Academy Awards, including Best Picture, the film follows decades of the life and work of László Tóth, an ingenious Bauhaus-trained Hungarian architect who survives the Holocaust and immigrates to the United States to pursue a new life. Cowritten and directed by Brady Corbet, it’s a fictional story with underpinnings of world and architectural history. The narrative centers around Tóth, played by Academy Award winner Adrien Brody, designing and building a monumental, brutalist-style community center and church-like space for a wealthy and mercurial client. That building, known in the film as the Institute, does not actually exist as a built project. So production designer Judy Becker had to design it for the film. The final building design showcases brutalism on a grand scale, with large and cascading rectilinear blocks of concrete topped with soaring towers. “The first thing Brady asked me to do, and this was well before official prep, was to design the Institute,” says Becker, whose production design is among the film’s Oscar nominations. The building is so essential to the story that how it looked ended up guiding the rest of the film’s production. Becker, not the fictional Tóth, is the true architect behind The Brutalist. [Photo: courtesy A24] Drawing from a personal passion Though not a trained architect, Becker drew from decades of interest in art and architectureparticularly the stark concrete modernism of the brutalist styleto bring the Institute to physical form. “The movie seemed kind of tailor-made for me because, for a very long time, I’ve been in love with brutalist architecture,” she says. “Way before there was a group of people that loved brutalist architecture, I loved it.” Becker’s architecture for The Brutalist was also inspired by the mid-century works of modernist architects trained at the Bauhaus, which the fictional Tóth attended before the outbreak of World War II and his imprisonment at the Buchenwald concentration camp. These biographical details in the script were some of the few aspects guiding the design of the Institute. [Photo: courtesy A24] Building an architectural connection to the film’s characters Two specific architectural details were also drawn directly from the script’s dialog: an aperture in the Institute’s roof and a central altar on which the aperture projects a cross at noon. Revealed in dialog only until the very end of the 3-hour-20-minute film, Becker’s design for the Institute also had to reflect an architectural connection to the two concentration camps where Tóth and his wife, separated during the war, were imprisoned. Much was open to Becker’s interpretation. [Image: courtesy A24] “I researched in great detail the architecture of the concentration camps and looked at overhead plans and aerial photographs, and also the interiors of the bunkers where the [people] were imprisoned,” says Becker. “It was very, very useful for me to do that. It was also very emotional, and let’s say stressful and draining, but important.” Her research also extended to the outbuildings of the concentration camps, including their crematoriums. “Personally, I intended the Institute to look like a gigantic crematorium that was passing as a church,” she says. [Image: courtesy A24] Some of these details appear only briefly, or obliquely, in the film. The most comprehensive view the audience is given of the building is a scale model used for a client review and a community meeting. The actual building is shown as a nascent construction site and later as a nearly finished project. [Image: courtesy A24] Becker says filming the building was essential to the story, but a challenge to do without actually building it. What ended up in the film is a pastiche of the scale model, sets to show the construction site, and a combination of location shoots that included an abandoned grain silo and an underground reservoir in the city of Budapest. “It was a complicated process,” she says. Crafting original mid-century work for the Brutalist Becker’s role as production designer also involved more typical facets of the job, such as set design and location furnishing. But, unique to a film about an architect, she also had to put her mid-century design chops to work creating an avant-garde library space that appears early in the film, as well as Bauhaus-inspired furniture Tóth’s character creates shortly after arriving in the U.S. [Image: courtesy A24] “Most of the time, when I did additional research for those periods, it was to avoid imitating anyone,” Becker says. “I didn’t want what László designed to look like another designer.” [Photo: courtesy A24] Though Becker says her work as a production designer always involves getting inside the minds of the characters in the film, this project called on her to almost become the actual architect behind the architecture of The Brutalist. “I was really trying hard to make him original, make his work original,” Becker says. “Sometimes, I believe that he did exist! I talk about him as if he was a real person. But he only lives inside of me as a designer.”
Category:
E-Commerce
In another move from the Trump administration aimed at disrupting climate science, the Commerce Department has ordered NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to search grants for climate-change-related terms, signaling that it may work to cancel that funding. Its a move that could threaten a wide array of projectsincluding infrastructure work on bridges and roadsand leaves researchers uncertain about the future of their work. NOAA is one of the worlds leading climate science agencies, and it funds work on everything from atmospheric studies to wildfires to fishery recovery. NOAA also has funding available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for habitat restoration, coastal resilience, and weather forecasting. The Trump administrations directive to search grants for climate terms includes words like climate, climate science, carbon, environmental quality, and pollution. This follows the move from Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to search NOAA databases for DEI content. But terms like diversity could come up in discussions about ecological or biodiversity, researchers sayand climate terms are ubiquitous in everything the agency works on. Youre going to have a hard time finding grant awards that dont mention climate change, simply because of its role in all of these areas of science, says Douglas Price, whose work has focused on grant funding and climate research. It speaks to the blunt-force approach that’s being taken across the government right now. Infrastructure projects are tied to climate science By singling out climate-related terminology, all types of NOAA-funded work could be under threat. That includes infrastructure projects that have to take climate impacts into considerationbasically, anything you build, Price says. Anything that uses concrete, steel, asphalt, you have to be looking at extreme heat and extreme precipitation events. If youre going to exclude climate change from the planning and engineering of any sorts of projects, youre making them vulnerable to climate extremes that were seeing with regularity now. Whether in a tiny, coastal New England town or a major city like New York, infrastructure like roads, bridges, rail lines, and tunnels must consider climate threats. What are the new temperature extremes that we’re going to see? What is the new baseline for 100-year storms? What are the flooding extremes were going to see and how do we size storm sewers? Price says. Infrastructure projects are meant to last decades, so we cant build new bridges, for example, only for the climate extremes were currently experiencing; we have to think about the projected extremes well see in 50 years. Already, our current infrastructure is at risk. One environmental nonprofit worker, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of fears that his organization could be targeted by the administration, is concerned about this directive affecting existing agreements. His nonprofit uses funding that comes from other organizations via NOAA grants. One recent project involves designing and building two bridges to replace undersized culverts. When culverts are too small, the water flowing through them is stronger, which enhances erosion, blocks fish from passing through, and risks washing out structures. These culverts increase the risk of road failure and are barriers to spawning migration for salmon species, the worker says. These projects all explicitly mention climate change and habitat diversity. These phrases are in there because NOAA guidance is to design road crossings to account for anticipated changes due to climate change. Overall, ignoring climate impacts doesn’t stop them from happeningit just stops us from being prepared. By banning certain terms, Price says, You’re blindfolding yourself and walking into a strange room, and you know that there are lots of sharp objects in that room you can stumble into, but youve chosen to not look for them. A matter of life and death for at-risk communities Other NOAA-funded work is more on the nose when it comes to climate change, like mitigation efforts or environmental justice projectsboth specifically on Trumps radar for cuts. This isnt work being done in some lab that has implications for far into the future. Its being applied almost immediately to problems that we face, Price says. Grants help connect research institutions with vulnerable communities and the government agencies that can provide them resources. That could mean communicating flood risks to coastal communities or ensuring that the recovery efforts for the Los Angeles wildfires arent leaving less-wealthy communities behind. Or take an impact like extreme heat, which poses special risk for communities with lots of elderly residents or people with disabilities. If we cant understand those risks and where the vulnerabilities are, and if we cant help policymakers come up with ways of getting support to those communities, more people will die when we have extreme heat events than would otherwise, he says. This holds true for any extreme weather event. The main reason we want to understand climate change and that we want to increase resilience to impacts is because those impacts often are life-and-death matters to people, Price adds. These things arent abstract. They arent a game. Were honestly very concerned about peoples lives in the work that we do. A cloud of uncertainty for researchers A larger issue with targeting specific terms like climate or diversity is that it removes them from crucial context. You can’t talk about statistics without talking about bias; you cant talk about IT security without talking about privilege; you can’t talk about any population of humans, animals, or bacteria without talking about population diversity, Price says. Sifting through the results requires a certain understanding of these topics, one that the nonprofit worker doubts young DOGE workers have. The administrations approach isnt necessarily meant to be productive or exact. Instead, Price notes, its a way of creating a political climate where these topics feel threatened, and if you’re involved with these things, you’re at risk. With agency-level communication largely shut down and ever-changing orders, its difficult to know how this will all proceedwhether grants will actually be cut short, whether the courts will step in, whether researchers need to think about working with Congress. Theres a large cloud of uncertainty around how all of this is being done, he says. That means many researchers and their institutions are still looking for the best pathway to defend their work. But for climate researchers, antagonism isnt totally new. Climate scientists are quite used to being attacked poltically, Price says. Its just that now the attacks are focused on a particular vulnerability in science in general, which is the way that it is funded by the federal government.
Category:
E-Commerce
When Dr. David Rabin told me how Apollo Sessions worked, my exact first thought was, poppycock. This was an app, he said, that would turn my iPhone into a healing device using the vibrations of the phones haptic engine. By stimulating the vagus nervea core component of the parasympathetic nervous system responsible for the bodys recovery and relaxation mechanismsusing certain frequencies, this iOS app would make me feel different. It works, he assured me. With trauma patients in clinical settings, he claimed. As someone who is skeptical about wundermedicine by default, I didnt believe it. But as someone who has lived through a few years of a traumatic experience, I was curious. I wanted to try it. And Im glad I did.[Image: Apollo Neuroscience]The science behind ApolloFor 20 years, Rabin has studied chronic stress, focusing on the effects of addiction and trauma on veterans, women, and children. Witnessing the limitations of medication in treating these conditions, he and his colleagues at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center began exploring non-drug treatments. They discovered that various techniques, such as soothing touch, music, and talk therapy could induce a state of safety learning in the body, promoting recovery and reducing stress. This exploration led them to experiment with vibrations as a means to trigger the bodys natural relaxation response. Just like music can calm your body or getting a hug can calm your body, we can send soothing vibrations that are like music composed for your touch receptor system in your body to trigger the safety nervous system, Rabin explains.[Image: Apollo Neuroscience]These vibrations, akin to the calming rhythm of ocean waves or a cats purr, activate the vagus nerve. This is a key player in regulating the autonomic nervous system, which controls involuntary bodily functions such as heart rate, digestion, and respiration. By activating the vagus nerve, Apollos vibrations promote a shift towards the parasympathetic branch of the autonomic nervous system, responsible for rest and recovery. This shift counteracts the effects of chronic stress, which often keeps the body in a state of heightened arousal, leading to fatigue, anxiety, and difficulty concentrating. And since the vagus nerve can affect your state in different directions, if you manipulate the frequency of the vibration, you will trigger different physical responses.The teams initial research focused on using this technology to help veterans cope with trauma. However, they soon realized the potential benefits for everyday stress and began testing it on themselves and others in real-world situations. The results were so remarkable that they caught them by surprise: improved sleep, better focus, increased energy, and reduced reliance on stimulants like coffee. Recognizing the transformative potential of this discovery, Rabin and his colleagues decided to keep testing and eventually founded Apollo Neuroscience, a company that packaged what they learned into Apollo Neuro, a consumer wearable that used a haptic engine and software to help anyone destress (it was a finalist in our World Changing Ideas Award 2021).According to Rabin, Apollo Neuros effectiveness is backed by rigorous scientific research. He claims that they have completed eight clinical double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled crossover trials, with more than 1,700 subjects. Three of them are published and five are currently accepted for publication or under peer review for publication in 2025, he says. The company also claims it has 13 more ongoing clinical trials at different hospitals. One of the reviewed studies he shared with me, published in the Journal of Rheumatology, demonstrates that the Apollo wearable device led to significant improvements in fatigue, reduced instances of Raynaud phenomenon (a condition affecting blood flow to extremities), and enhanced overall quality of life, including physical function, mood, sleep, and social participation. The study, which involved participants wearing the device for a minimum of 15 minutes daily for four weeks, showed that the technology was well-tolerated and used far beyond the requested time, with no adverse effects. The iPhone versionBuilding on the success of the wearable device, the company has now launched Apollo Sessions, an iPhone app that delivers a subset of the same therapeutic vibrations without the need for the wearable. The idea of using the always-stressful iPhone vibration for good may seem nuts, but according to Rabin, Apollo Sessions takes the very device that often makes us feel overwhelmed and transforms it into a tool for calm and clarity.Rabinwho is also executive director at The Board of Medicinetells me that the companys mission is to create technology that heals humanity. We designed the wearable to prove that that was possible, he says, and it does [but] not everybody can afford a wearable. Thats when they looked at the haptic engines in phones to see if it was possible to do the same. It worked for the iPhone, he says, but not for Android phones, because they dont have the same level of access to the haptic capabilities of the hardware. While the Apollo Neuro devicewhich is worn on the wrist or anklehas more advanced features thanks to a more powerful haptic engine with a wider range of vibration intensities and patterns, the Apollo Sessions app offers only a subset of these functions. The iPhone Apollo Sessions app makes the core vibration technology accessible to everyone, Rabin says. The wearable has all these advanced AI and sleep benefits the phone does not have. The app focuses on providing daytime relaxation and stress relief, too.[Image: Apollo Neuroscience]Apollo Sessions offers a range of vibration patterns. These Vibesas the company calls temare designed to ease you into different states. Whether you need a boost of energy with Espresso Shot, a calming embrace with Hug, or a moment of relaxation with Relax, Rabin says Apollo Sessions can do that for you. He recommended that I start with the Hug Vibewhich is free to tryby placing the phone on your chest for two to five minutes, preferably in airplane mode with do not disturb enabled, to fully immerse in the experience for that limited time. He also said that I could put it on my yoga mat while I meditate or on the mattress while I go to sleep.Does it actually work?I tried it a few times. And, despite my natural skepticism, it does work. Perhaps it was self-suggestion. Maybe its a placebo effect. But it did what it says it does, especially the calming vibes. So well, in fact, that I asked my own therapist and he explained to me all the science behind this and other similar therapies associated with vibration and rhythm. The Apollo Sessions app is free. You can try the Hug one for two minutes, which should be enough to feel an effect. Or you can subscribe for $9.99 per month to go deeper, unlocking unlimited access to sessions that offer six different Vibes. Rabin says that the plan is to keep expanding this library as their research finds out the effect of other frequencies and vibration patterns.
Category:
E-Commerce
Sites : [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] next »