 |
|
|
|||||
Every four years, the National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) provides a snapshot of how students across the country are performing in math and English. It doesnt tell us about individual students; instead, it gives us information about how well our public schools are preparing students. The 2024 results showed that 28% of 8th graders were proficient in mathematics (on grade level), and 30% were proficient in reading. In both, the average scores and proficiency rates are still below 2019 rates. One explanation for this dismal reality? Public schools simply arent capable of delivering results for students. But look closely at historical trends in NAEP Reading results from Mississippi. In 1998, only 18% of the states 4th graders were at least proficient in reading, relative to 29% across the nation. By 2024, Mississippi was beating the nation, with 32% of their 4th graders at proficient or advanced proficiency in reading compared to 30% nationally. Why? They will tell you they invested heavily in evidence-based approaches and programs for teaching readingthe science of reading. Unfortunately our states and districts often dont have a supply of effective, useful and usable products and solutions to choose from. Whats broken is not our schools; its the lack of investment in education research and innovation that develops and delivers better solutions to them. If we care about education, we must invest in education R&D like we do in other sectors vital to our nations well-being. Lets start by dispelling the myth that we dont know how to help young people learn. In fact, we have decades of science from fields like psychology and neuroscience telling us a lot about how children learn and how learning progresses within fields like math or reading. The science of learning and human development tells us about the many factors that shape a students ability to learn, from their motivation and interests to environmental forces around them. The real problem The problem is that we dont have a coherent system for translating basic scientific research in education fields into research and development. We lack a clear system for innovating new solutions and scaling them for sustained outcomes. Education R&D funding in the U.S. has historically been a tiny fraction of R&D funding compared to defense, health, energy, and agriculture sectors. Those other fields have structures that support and sustain such efforts. For instance, DARPA in the defense industry, or ARPA-E in energy define bold what if? questions and then catalyze funding so that researchers, builders, and industry collaborate toward future-oriented solutions. The Department of Educations Institute for Education Sciences, prior to its effective dismantling by the current administration, historically funded basic research and program evaluation, but as a tiny (less than 1%) portion of the Departments overall budget. That program evaluation budget goes quickly when spread across the many entities that deliver products and services across 50 states. It results in lots of one-off studies of solutions versus a truly problem-driven approach, focusing and directing resources to finding the solution. One problem with the solution-centric approach is that the solutions often originate from an education product marketplace thats disconnected from the education research sector. Entrepreneurs and companies launch products, then gather data to see how they perform in classrooms. Imagine if a pharmaceutical company had its product teams (not researchers) develop a new drug, market it to a wide audience, then gathered data from users to see what happened. Thats the norm in education. We also often fail to scale what works. Take the science of reading: That researchmuch of it federally fundedhas been around for decades. It eventually took a few well-informed state leaders and a podcast to finally bring the science of reading to scale in products, practices, and state-level policies. What real investment in education R&D looks like Theres a better way. We can create structures that enable and encourage problem- and research-driven innovation, align policies to desired outcomes, and sustain these efforts through ample and reliable funding. Its long past time for an ARPA-Ed that builds on all weve learned from DARPA and other advanced research project agencies, adapted for the unique needs of K-12 education. At AERDF we have built such a model to demonstrate how actively managed R&D, done in close collaboration with educators and learners, can lead to breakthrough science and technology to power new solutions. An ARPA-Ed, or its equivalent, can build on this template. Sustained, well-funded research and development in other fields has shaped how we live today. GPS technology, the internet, and the mRNA vaccine all came out of DARPA projects. Theyve changed the way we navigate, communicate, and protect ourselves from disease. What might similar investment in education R&D do to transform how people learn? The aim is not to control where schools spend their money or what happens in classrooms. A strong education innovation system ensures that communities have a wide range of already-proven options to select, making the best choices for their students. This is really about what our young people need in order to thrive. Every child deserves an opportunity to pursue their educational and career goals. Lets make the necessary investments because when we succeed at educating every child, we create a prepared workforce, our next generation of leaders, and stronger communities. Its time to act Education is essential infrastructure for our economy and our communities. Lets approach it that way. This is not the time to dismantle and defund NSF and the Department of Education. And this isnt just a call for more federal funding. Philanthropy and the private sector also must think differently if we are to catalyze capital systematically in the way fields like energy and health have done. Lastly, we need policies at the state and local level that hold the market accountable for the solutions delivered. For the future we dream of, we need an education system that worksand that means investing like we mean it. Auditi Chakravarty is CEO of The Advanced Education Research and Development Fund (AERDF).
Category:
E-Commerce
One easy way to ensure an unflattering nickname has staying power is to act defensive about it. Apparently, the same goes for unflattering acronyms. After multiple news outlets reported on Wednesday morning that Wall Street has embraced a new acronym for approaching the topic of tariffsTACO, or Trump Always Chickens Outa reporter asked the president about it during an afternoon press conference. Trump responded apoplectically, scolding the reporter for her nasty question, and admonishing her, Dont ever say what you said. So, naturally, within minutes, the internet was awash with AI-generated images and other memes linking Trump with tacos. Reporter: Wall Street analysts have a new term called the TACO trade.. Saying Trump always chickens out on tariffs Trump: I kick out?Reporter: Chicken out.— Acyn (@acyn.bsky.social) 2025-05-28T17:13:22.578Z It all started on May 2, when Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined the phrase in the publications Unhedged newsletter. Regular readers will not be surprised by Unhedgeds view that the recent rally has a lot to do with markets realizing that the US administration does not have a very high tolerance for market and economic pressure, and will be quick to back off when tariffs cause pain, Armstrong wrote, as stocks began recovering just over a month after the U.S.s ostensible Liberation Day. This is the Taco theory: Trump Always Chickens Out. Even someone with only a cursory understanding of international trade would have probably noticed the pattern by this past weekend, when Trump backtracked on a recently announced 50% tariff threat against the EU. The Streisand effect, with a dash of hot sauce Giving this pattern a name so easy to remember, and so devastatingly diminishing, may have predetermined its ubiquity. Although the term had flourished on Wall Street in the weeks since Armstrong first coined it, TACO only broke containment when enough reporters had finally written about it that one pushed Trump to actually respond. Now that hes done so, and revealed in the process that the phrase has apparently hit a nerve, its social medias turn to respond. Taco Don memes are flourishing on X, mostly in the form of AI-generated images. Some of them depict Trump utterly ensconced in tacos or taco-related items. TACO =Trump Always Chickens Out. (No volume, no one needs to hear his voice lol).— Poor Nihilist Me (@poornihilistme.bsky.social) 2025-05-28T17:55:52.857Z Others still manage to depict Trump as both taco and chicken. TACO: Trump Always Chickens Out— Morgan J Freeman (@mjfree.bsky.social) 2025-05-28T21:17:08.862Z Anyone abandoning the AI route and instead searching manually for chicken-adjacent images involving Trump will strike gold in at least one spot.When Trump hosted Saturday Night Live in 2004, he performed in a sketch called Donald Trumps House of Wings, during which the cast dances around him in chicken costumessomething that has not escaped notice on X. Another image from Trumps past has come back to haunt him even more, though, since the TACO acronym emerged. In 2016, then-candidate Trump celebrated Cinco de Mayo by tweeting an image of himself grinning over a Trump Tower Grill taco bowl, fork in hand. That image is now making the rounds again on X and Bluesky in its new context. Even sitting U.S. Senator Tina Smith posted the image on her Bluesky account. — Tina Smith (@smith.senate.gov) 2025-05-28T18:09:03.262Z What happens from here might feel familiar. When the internet exploded with weird JD Vance memes earlier this year, fans of the vice resident attempted to reclaim the narrative by tweeting similar memes to support Vance. Indeed, at least one X user is already trying to repurpose the new TACO acronym to mean Trump Always Crushes Opposition. Whether that version of the phrase will actually gain any traction remains to be seen. In the meantime, meme-lovers, Trump critics, and those who enjoy looking at tacos are eating well.
Category:
E-Commerce
The International Labor Organization (ILO), an agency of the United Nations, has downgraded its global employment forecast for 2025, saying “the global economy is growing at a slower pace than we had anticipated.” In its latest edition of its World Employment and Social Outlook Trends report, the ILO forecast 7 million less jobs would be created in 2025 globally, for a total of 53 million jobs, down from 60 millionbased on economic growth projections from the International Monetary Funds (IMF) April 2025 World Economic Outlook. The numbers translate into slower overall employment growth across the globe in 2025, down to 1.5% from 1.7%; and lower expected GDP growth of 2.8%, down from previous forecasts of 3.2%. “Our report now tells us that if geopolitical tensions and trade disruptions continue, and if we do not address fundamental questions that are reshaping the world of work, then they will most certainly have negative ripple effects on labor markets worldwide,” ILO Director-General Gilbert F. Houngbo said in a statement. The report found the United States was a driving factor in worldwide employment growth, with 84 million jobs across 71 countries “directly or indirectly tied to U.S. consumer demand, now increasingly at risk of disruption due to elevated trade tensions.” Of those 84 million jobs, 56 million are located in the Asia-Pacific region. However, Canada and Mexico have the highest share of jobs (17.1%) that are exposed to trade disruption. The report does make some recommendations: Houngbo said countries and employers can make a difference “by strengthening social protection, investing in skills development, promoting social dialogue, and building inclusive labor markets to ensure that technological change benefits all.”
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||