 |
|
|
|||||
President Trumps repeated blows to Head Start over the last 10 weeks have been a source of growing consternation for childcare providers and advocates across the country. As a federal program that covers childcare for low-income families, Head Start enables many providers to serve communities that struggle to afford the steep cost of early childhood education. First, there was Trumps proposed freeze on federal grants and loans, which was not intended to impact Head Start funding but left many childcare centers in the lurch. Some providers reported not being able to access their funding, forcing a number of them to close temporarily. Others worried that their funding could still disappear without warning at any point. ‘An attack on childcare’ The funding freeze proposal was rescinded not long afterbut childcare providers were right to suspect that Head Start would remain a target. Last week, the Trump administration entirely shut down five of the 12 regional Head Start offices and laid off countless administrators at the Department of Health and Human Services who oversee both Head Start and the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF), another key source of federal funding for childcare. The move has left many childcare providers with no avenue to get answers for their questions about grants or approval for critical updates to their facilities. From my perspective, what is happening is an attack on childcare and early education under the veil of efficiency, says Stephanie Schmit, the director of child care and early education at the Center for Law and Social Policy. We are seeing just mass chaos and confusion and worry and uncertainty as a result.” Beyond the immediate impact, however, the widespread layoffs could destabilize an already precarious industry and effectively compromise childcare access for all kinds of families. The childcare industry is chronically underfunded, between the high labor costs and a lack of adequate federal investment. But the latest swipes at Head Start come after pandemic relief fundingwhich helped prop up the industry for a few yearswas depleted, leaving providers particularly strapped for resources. ‘Death by a thousand cuts’ The attacks on Head Start are not exactly unprecedented. In fact, Project 2025 Project 2025 explicitly called for eliminating the program altogether, and during his first term, Trump pushed for budget cuts to Head Start and similar federal programs that subsidize childcare, like the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG). Its important to keep in mind that this was in Project 2025, and its been a goal of the conservative movement for a long time, says Whitney Pesek, the senior director of federal childcare policy at the National Women’s Law Center. Its death by a thousand cuts. Its not like they’re wiping it all out in one day, but they’re tearing it apart bit by bit. Head Start, which dates back to the 1960s and was initially conceived of as a program to help fight poverty, has long been a lifeline for low-income families, offering not just childcare assistance but also ancillary social services. For providers, the program has also been a dependable source of funding that allows them to offer childcare services to families who wouldnt otherwise be able to afford it. The grants are five years, and it’s reliable, especially if you have a full Head Start center, Schmit says. So I think many programs have come to rely on the stability of Head Startand that’s a good thing. A domino effect on daycare But its not just the providers and families eligible for Head Start who will feel the effects of the current upheaval. Childcare advocates and experts warn that many more families could lose access to high quality care if the layoffs undermine the crucial oversight ensured by federal and regional staffers, who help enforce safety standards across the industry and support childcare centers that rely heavily on federal grants. The funding secured by programs like CCDBG, for example, is distributed to states to subsidize care for certain familiesbut also to improve overall quality of care. Head Start programs may feel the greatest impact, but plenty of other childcare providers keep their centers afloat through a patchwork of subsidies and other sources of federal funding, coupled with families that pay entirely out of pocket. If there are fewer childcare grants available to providers, they might be forced to increase costs for all families and stop accepting as many low-income children. This is just going to make it more difficult for families to find care, Pesek says. It’s going to make it more expensive, and it’s going to make it less safe. The people who staff regional Head Start offices, in particular, are responsible for managing day to day challenges at childcare centers and offering technical assistance to providers. Those offices are also tasked with expanding supply and access to childcare, and they are often uniquely equipped to address issues faced by families and providers in those regions. Since they are so specialized in their regions, they really have relationships with these grantees and know their communities, Pesek says. To lose that expertise and institutional knowledgeit’s just going to be such a loss. Preparing for an uncertain future Advocates worry that these changes could be a precursor for more pointed budget cuts and funding gaps for childcare assistance programs, but also that the lack of institutional support could further fracture an industry that already struggles to retain staff and pay fair wages. Reliable access to care ensures that parents and families are able to work, but the childcare industry itself is also a major employer. For years, advocates have tried to raise the wage floor for childcare workersa tall order when the cost of care is already out of reach for so many families. “The cost of care is already lower than what it actually costs to provide the high quality care that we really want families to have access toand that’s because the way childcare is designed in this country is that care can only be as expensive as people can afford,” Schmit says. “That’s why public investment in child care is so critical, and why the threats as a result of the layoffs and other actions will have such a significant impact on the childcare sector.” For childcare providers who are already battling financial strain and regulatory hurdles on a daily basis, the fresh challenges they are facing under the Trump administration could push them out of the industry altogether. “A lot of them do [this work] because they get so much joy from caring for children,” Schmit says. “But you could see how a situation like this would cause providers to really question whether this instability is something that they can stick through.”
Category:
E-Commerce
AI is an extraordinary tool that amplifies our cognitive capacity. It can analyze, summarize, and generate content faster than any human. However, AI is only ever as good as the questions we ask it. It will never replace our capacity for thinking, and can, in fact, reinforce bias because it is learning what we teach it. For this reason, the top skills of the future include thinking skills. According to the World Economic Forums Future of Jobs report, employers anticipate that beyond technical literacy, the most in-demand capabilities will be creative thinking, critical thinking, resilience, and the capacity for learning. Thinking is a premium, and yet it is also the very thing that is most at risk. We all know that when it comes to data, rubbish in = rubbish out. The same goes for our mind. What we feed it and how we use it determines the quality of our contribution and the value we add. As a high-performance coach and leadership expert, I spend my time consulting with leaders and their teams, challenging them to do better thinking and extract the value of their collective capacity. Modern-day workers are facing a triple threat from the joint epidemics of algorithms, attention theft, and burnout. Heres why: 1. Algorithms reinforce biases More and more, our capacity to think, create, and problem-solve is being challenged by algorithms delivered through social media. Our viewpoints are being regurgitated back to us via algorithms that sense what we like, what we tolerate, and what we think we need. Social media serves to reinforce existing beliefs, not challenge them. We are slowly losing the capacity for critical thinking, and this is the very capacity we need to develop if we are to remain adaptive in a world where cognitive load is being managed more and more by computers. 2. Attention theft robs us of time Attention theft is catastrophic to independent thinking and crippling our ability to focus. How many notifications are pinging right now to pull your attention away from reading this article? How many times a day are you pulled away from the task at hand? Research from Tania Barney, neuroscience and sensory processing expert, suggests that distractions are costing us time as well as money. Her research found: An average of 2.1 hours are lost daily as a result of distractions. The average time spent on a task before we get distracted is 11 minutes. The average time it takes after a distraction to return to a task is 25 minutes. After meetings, emails, unplanned interactions, and rest breaks, how many hours do we have left in a day for thinking and productive work? We get pulled into the urgent things that feel pressing but do not meaningfully matter (like chats with colleagues, reply-all emails, and notification alerts). All this leads to the next major threat to thinkingburnout. 3. Burnout robs us of energy Burnout is the compound interest on lost productivity due to attention theft. Just because were getting distracted by urgent unimportant stuff doesnt mean that the real important stuff goes away. It piles up, weighing us down psychologically and eating into recreation hours where we should be recharging our batteries through rest, exercise, or time with loved ones. Burnout is a global issue, costing humans their well-being and businesses millions in lost productivity. Burnout is the result of prolonged work stress. Symptoms include overwhelm, constant exhaustion, and a feeling of being ineffective at work no matter how hard you try. Increased rates of burnout add up to bad news for business. Burnout has been identified as one of the leading causes driving people to leave their jobs. But it also leads to disengagement, which can cost employers 34% of a disengaged employee’s annual salary, according to the Gallup State of the Global Workplace 2021 report. Prioritize team thinking time to leverage collective potential With the joint epidemics of algorithms, attention theft, and burnout, our most precious resources have changed from time and money to energy and attention. To counteract this, we all need to be more curious. Promote and legitimize thinking time by asking more questions in daily interactions. Encourage your team members to build on one anothers ideas. Create regular cadences when the team meets to reflect, reprioritize, and reset, such as quarterly team-planning workshops. The future of work is humanand your capacity to create spaces and places where people can think, learn, adapt, and grow is what will allow teams and organizations to transform and endure.
Category:
E-Commerce
With their drab gray suits and their Buddy Holly glasses, the so-called traitorous eight don’t look like revolutionaries. Given no context, you can imagine them occupying some kind of middle-management role at a small regional bank. And yet these are the people you can thank for the digital world. The eightwhich included Intel cofounder Gordon Moorehad departed Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory to found Fairchild Semiconductor, which soon became the world’s biggest producer of electrical components for computers. Many of its founders would, in turn, leave again to launch their own ventures. Many of these companies coalesced in the same areathe place we now call Silicon Valleycreating an ecosystem for innovation and technological development that endures to this day. Look again at that photo. Even with the suits and the glasses, these are arguably some of the most interesting and influential people that the technology industry has ever known. Even if you don’t know their names, and even though they have never appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast, they still have a legacy that endures to this day. The Power of Hardware On a personal level, I have always found hardware more interesting than software. There’s a joke that CPUs are just “rocks we tricked into thinking,” which has some truth to it. You can’t help but be amazed at the process that turns iron, copper, gold, and silicon dioxide into something that can run unfathomably complex mathematical calculations, play chess, and stream Netflix. And that’s before you take into account that even the most basic consumer CPU has billions of transistors, each measuring a fraction of the width of a hair. Perhaps the main reason I’m drawn to hardware is that it’s often easy to measure whether something is better than the thing that preceded it. With a tape measure, you can see whether one computer is smaller than another. You can calculate how many mathematical operations a CPU can perform in a second, or count the number of pixels on a display. You can measure its weight, or the heat it gives off, or whether one battery has a larger capacity than another. Hardware is clean-cut. Straightforward. Unambiguous. And these improvements aren’t theoretical, but are felt directly by the end user. When a physical object is meaningfully better, you can tell. If you have upgraded from an Intel to an Apple Silicon Mac, you know this. You probably remember what it was like when you ditched your bulky CRT monitor for an LCD flat panel. You know the difference between a computer with a mechanical hard drive and one with flash storage. Hardware is typically built with utility in mind. The old adage “hardware is hard” is true, but it neglects the fact that it’s also pretty expensive. You only really build something if you believe it’s better than the existing thing, and that somebody will find it useful enough to pay for it. Silicon Valley Needs to Rediscover Its Roots The modern tech industryespecially that which now occupies the same hallowed ground once trod by the treacherous eighthas become a shell of its former self. Techs innovations feel only marginally iterative at best. It is this that makes me nostalgic for the era when Silicon Valley was about siliconor, more specifically, physical, tangible objects that changed the world. And I believe it is an era that we can, and must, return to. The Silicon Valley of the late 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s was a glorious time of American innovation and engineering, where verifiable geniuses discovered the breakthroughs that allowed our current world to exist. The integrated circuit. The microprocessor. The computer mouse. It was an era when technological vision and clear-thinking business strategy combined to bring new inventions to a market, and then popularize them to a global scale. And in doing so, Silicon Valley changed everything. To be clear, I am not just talking about vision. I’m talking about hardware. The applications we will need to run in the future will require faster, better computers, and we need somebody to invent them. Faster, better computers will allow us to reclaim ownership of the tech we use, enabling us to finally break free of the cloud. It will help undo some of the disastrous cultural changes that have occurred over the past decade or so, when people got used to the idea that they must always be subject to the mercies of another, larger tech company. Hardware is hard. Change is even harder. But in this case, I think it’s worth it. The Bright Light on the Tip of the Spear So, there is some cause for optimism, and its not in giant GPUs. Buried in the news coming out of CES was the announcement of Nvidias DGX Spark, a $3,000 desktop computer powered by Nvidias GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip, that went relatively unnoticed but I believe is a significant moment in personal computing. The DGX Spark delivers up to 1 petaflop of performance in a compact form factor, giving researchers and developers unprecedented access to cutting-edge computational power directly at their desks. Its like having a computer thats a thousand times faster than a regular desktop in the body of a Mac Mini, and Im a little surprised it isnt being taken more seriously. In more human terms, Nvidia created an ultrapowerful Mac Mini that developers, data scientists, and AI researchers are able to use to run reasonably large data workloads and AI models on their desk as opposed to a fleet of massive GPU servers in the cloud. While Silicon Valleys biggest companies have grown on the back of software, the truth is that it needs hardware to grow any further, and while those GPUs might be the headline-grabbers during Nvidias earnings, creating meaningful new kinds of computing is what will lead to actual innovation in software. As a result, by creating a Blackwell chip inside a Mac Mini-size supercomputer, Nvidia allows companies to crunch through large data sets or run self-hosted generative AI models quickly and efficiently, all without relying on the cloud to do so. This vastly lowers the barrier to entry for high-performance computing, which currently requires buying or renting expensive specialized hardware or spinning up expensive infrastructure. I’m going to dive briefly into why this matters. For years, both at Voltron Data and previously at BlazingSQL, I’ve advocated for clustering smaller, more efficient, and less-expensive GPUs together using high-performance networking. However, network limitations have always prevented full utilization of the cluster’s compute performance since data simply couldn’t move fast enough to keep GPUs fully fed. While it hasnt shipped yet, Nvidia has specifically called out the inclusion of ConnectX to allow users to connect two Nvidia DGX Spark computers together, as well as other features (NCCL, RDMA, GPUDirect storage) that are specifically built for faster networking. This will enable efficient parallel processing and high-bandwidth communication, making high-performance AI and analytics workloads accessible to a broader range of researchers and enterprises. A distributed model using a cluster of Nvidia DGX Spark units could offer a more cost-effective and flexible alternative to currentl available GPU clusters, lowering the barrier to entry for basically any high-performance computing use cases. My focus on Nvidia DGX Spark is to illustrate a greater point about what will keep Silicon Valley at the forefront of technological progress. True innovation doesnt come from just making things bigger or more powerful, but in the distinct relationship and interactions between software and hardware, and even between different pieces of hardware. Nvidia DGX Spark isnt just Nvidia making a chip smaller, but finding ways to add faster on-device memory, software to make getting the data to both the memory and the GPU faster, and (I imagine) some unique ways to keep it cool. The truly world-changing innovations and technological breakthroughs that will advance humanity will come from a deep commitment to silicon engineering, and Silicon Valley needs to remember that this is the only way that software will continue to grow.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||