Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.07Open Hotels reimagines budget stays with AI management and virtual staff
11.07AI Update, July 11, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Two Weeks
10.07SEO Principles: A Guide for Beginners [Infographic]
10.07How Persona-Driven AI Is Reshaping Brand Engagement and Audience Research
10.07AI-Driven ABM: Scaling Precision and Impact for B2B Growth
10.07Faroe Islands tackle overtourism with mystery road trips
09.07Tin Can brings back the landline to keep kids connected, not hooked
09.07What Influencers Want From Brand Partners
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.07Stocks Reversing Higher into Final Hour on US-Global Trade Deal Hopes, Earnings Outlook Optimism, Short-Covering, Tech/Biotech Sector Strength
14.07Electric vehicles to be discounted in government scheme
14.07Starbucks staff must work in the office four days a week
14.07State Farm defends hefty 27.2% hike in Illinois homeowners insurance rates
14.07Reddit starts verifying ages of users in the UK
14.07Mid-Day Market Internals
14.07Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
14.07Bull Radar
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .