Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

10.02ASUS Zenbook Duo (2026) review: Two screens really are better than one
10.02UK takes 'light touch' approach to regulating Apple and Google's app stores
10.02Toyota and Pony.ai start mass producing robotaxis for China
10.02Spotify now has more than 750 million monthly users
10.02The Morning After: DOJ may face investigation over removal of ICE agent tracking apps
10.02Waymo's vehicles are now fully driverless in Nashville
10.02Iberia caps Madrid-Barcelona airfares at EUR 99 after rail disaster 
09.02Riot Games is laying off half of the 2XKO development team
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

10.02How sports leagues are vying for Gen Z and Gen Alphas attention to build the next generation of fans
10.02Govt to sell 3% stake in BHEL via OFS, sets floor price at Rs 254 per share
10.02Warp unveils new software for collaborative AI coding 
10.02ASUS Zenbook Duo (2026) review: Two screens really are better than one
10.02Honda is reeling from Trumps tariffs, as latest report shows major blow to Japanese automaker
10.02Monks arrive in D.C. after their cross-country walk for peace. Heres what they have planned next
10.02UK takes 'light touch' approach to regulating Apple and Google's app stores
10.02Toyota and Pony.ai start mass producing robotaxis for China
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .