Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

11.02Streaming service Menta rethinks TV for people living with dementia
11.02Samsung's Galaxy S26 Unpacked event is on February 25
10.02The NLRB just gave up on SpaceX workers who claim they were illegally fired
10.02Facebook is offering Meta AI-powered animations for profile photos
10.02This Itch.io bundle to help Minnesota includes over 1,200 games and costs just $10
10.02Sam Bankman-Fried wants a re-trial for fraud charges
10.02Hubble showcases the Egg Nebula in all its dying-star glory
10.02Microsoft will start refreshing Secure Boot certificates in March for Windows 11 and Windows 10 ESU users
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

11.02Wednesday Watch
11.02Rupee falls 6 paise to 90.62 against US dollar in early trade
11.02ETMarkets Smart Talk | From tax amnesty to trade deals: What Budget 2026 means for global portfolios, decodes Bhaskar Hazra
11.02Positive Breakout: These 11 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
11.02S&P 500, Nasdaq dip with economic data, earnings in focus
11.02Market quote of the Day by Warren Buffett: Stock market is designed to transfer money from the active to the patient
11.02Federal judge keeps in place key parts of Illinois landmark law banning some credit card swipe fees
11.02Global Market Today: Asian stocks hold near record before US jobs data, gold up
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .