Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

05.12The 1977 cut of Star Wars will return to theaters in 2027
05.12Meta's latest acquisition suggests hardware plans beyond glasses and headsets
05.12Pixel owners: You can now use your phone as a Switch 2 webcam
05.12Liquid Swords' debut title is a $25 'noir action game' coming next year
05.12Netflix to buy Warner Bros. for $82.7 billion
05.12The Netflix and Warner Bros. deal might be great for shareholders, but not for anyone else
05.12Get three months of Apple Music for only $1 right now
05.12More Studio Ghibli 4K restorations are coming to IMAX in 2026
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

05.12Five takeaways from the blockbuster Netflix Warner Brothers deal
05.12The 1977 cut of Star Wars will return to theaters in 2027
05.12Monday's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
05.12Stocks Modestly Higher into Final Hour on US Economic Data, Earnings Outlook Optimism, Technical Buying, Tech/Consumer Discretionary Sector Strength
05.12Meta's latest acquisition suggests hardware plans beyond glasses and headsets
05.12The CEO of Chief on how the business world can better support women executives
05.12Pixel owners: You can now use your phone as a Switch 2 webcam
05.12CDC panel overturns 1991 newborn vaccine policy, triggering warnings of a public health backslide
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .