Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

19.02West Virginia is suing Apple alleging negligence over CSAM materials
19.02Nintendo announces surprise Switch 2 version of sci-fi RPG Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition
19.02Russia's recent blocking of Telegram is reportedly disrupting its military operations in Ukraine
19.02Meta reportedly plans to release a smartwatch this year
19.02French stickers turn aging devices into badges of honor
19.02Mark Zuckerberg testifies in social media addiction trial that Meta just wants Instagram to be 'useful'
19.02Dyson announces the PencilWash wet floor cleaner
18.02Gemini can now generate a 30-second approximation of what real music sounds like
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

19.02West Virginia is suing Apple alleging negligence over CSAM materials
19.02US trade deficit hits fresh high despite Trump's tariffs
19.02Lobbying firm co-founded by Mandelson faces collapse
19.02Nintendo announces surprise Switch 2 version of sci-fi RPG Xenoblade Chronicles X: Definitive Edition
19.02Frida built its brand on dirty jokes for parents. Now the internet isnt laughing
19.02Google cofounder Sergey Brins unretirement is a lesson for the rest of us  
19.02For some job seekers, Tinder is the new LinkedIn
19.02Firing the CEO is the wrong answer, ask Sean McDermott
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .