Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

10.02Iberia caps Madrid-Barcelona airfares at EUR 99 after rail disaster 
09.02Riot Games is laying off half of the 2XKO development team
09.02DOJ may face investigation for pressuring Apple, Google to remove apps for tracking ICE agents
09.02OpenAI starts testing ads in ChatGPT
09.02Here's how to disable Ring's creepy Search Party feature
09.02YouTube TV launches curated subscription packages this week
09.02Apple's Magic Mouse drops to only $68
09.02The first PlayStation State of Play of 2026 will air on February 12
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

10.02US to exempt some Bangladeshi clothes from tariffs
10.02Positive Breakout: These 11 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
10.02Gov. JB Pritzker talked Bears with with NFL commissioner, says progress is being made to keep team in Illinois
10.02Actis enters race to re-acquire Sprng Energy from Shell at $2 billion valuation
10.02Jewellery stocks rally on back of US-India trade deal
10.02SBI logs biggest single-day gain in 19 months on strong Q3 results
10.02Why food fraud persists, even with improving tech
10.02Gold, silver ETFs gain as investors buy the dip after sharp fall
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .