Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.12Apple escalates its appeal of a $2 billion fine from a UK antitrust lawsuit
28.12Ubisoft is rolling back Rainbow Six Siege servers after being forced to shut them down
28.12Ayaneo's latest Game Boy remake will have an early bird starting price of $269
28.12Samsung's two new speakers will deliver crisp audio while blending into your decor
27.12OpenAI is hiring a new Head of Preparedness to try to predict and mitigate AI's harms
27.12Heres the first real look at the Retroid Pocket 6 running PS2 games
27.12Stardew Valley players on the Nintendo Switch 2 get a free upgrade
26.12New York State will require warning labels on social media platforms
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

29.12China's BYD poised to overtake Tesla in 2025 EV sales
29.12At least 13 dead after train derails in Mexico
29.12Global stocks hold near record, silver at all-time high
29.12IPO boom gets reality check as nearly half of 2025 listings slip below issue price
29.12Will Encora acquisition cement Coforges AI leadership in healthcare and hi-tech?
29.12Nifty faces 26,200 hurdle; indicators flag uncertainty
29.12Why are young people leaving to work abroad?
29.12Many new UK drone users must take theory test before flying outside
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .